Lisa Paitz Spindler, Danger Gal

May 31

Your Very Own Cultured Neural Network

When I started writing Remembrancer I was intrigued by cyberpunk, post-modernism and transhumanism. I still am, and I know that the future will be nothing like we imagine, but I still keep postulating.

neuron constellationOne of the reasons I started reading the Neurophilosopher’s Blog is I was interested in how our brain capacity might evolve and how we might push that along. I was also conducting research for Remembrancer, a story where a small group of people have brain implants. The purpose of these implants is not to make them uber-soldiers or to interface with AIs, but to store other people’s memories. Think about how different we might view historical events if we could see them through Thomas Jefferson’s actual memories, or Einstein’s or Mother Theresa’s?

While I find that compelling, I’m a science geek at heart. I wanted the mechanism to be as organic as possible, not just a chunk of hardware shoved into brain tissue, and I came up with an idea for a cultured neural network using cells from the person’s own tissue. Now I read that scientists are indeed creating neural networks very similar to what I describe:

Cultured neurons seem like ants away from their colony: removed from their parent organ, dissociated from their fellow workers and placed into an unnatural environment. But neurons plated onto a culture dish connect to each other, forming simple neural networks that give rise to spontaneous electrical activity. And, in recent years, researchers have developed culture dishes containing arrays of microelectrodes embedded within them, such that the electrical activity of the cultured neurons can be recorded. These new techniques have revealed the remarkable functional properties of neurons in culture – the cultured networks of dissociated cells can “learn”. In other words, they can modify their initially spontaneous activity into something purposeful, such as controlling a flight simulator or controlling the movements of artificial animals in a virtual environment.

While some value Remembrancers, others fear them and in some cultures in this universe they’re considered Untouchable. A Remembrancer doesn’t copy a person’s memories, she takes them. The transfer is conducted at death, which is the outcome regardless of whether a person’s body is actually failing beforehand. The implant is organic; there’s very little outward indication that a person is a Remembrancer, a particular problem on worlds that consider them to be Untouchable. Also, an unexpected facet of the download is a witness to a person’s last moments when they depart for their own version of the afterlife.

As so often happens, scientific developments enable me to explore all sorts of inter- and intra-personal conflict. What happens to a shaman figure who witnesses death, and a kind of rebirth, over and over again? What happens if that power is abused? What kind of person would become a Remembrancer? Who are her friends and enemies and why?

Image Courtesy of 3DScience.com.

• • •
 
May 31

Nerd Fun: My Favorite Microbe

Published in Nerd Fun | one comment

What? Microbes don’t have feelings too? The site sells:

typhoid…stuffed animals that look like tiny microbes—only a million times actual size! Now available: The Common Cold, The Flu, Sore Throat, Stomach Ache, Cough, Ear Ache, Bad Breath, Kissing Disease, Athlete’s Foot, Ulcer, Martian Life, Beer & Bread, Black Death, Ebola, Flesh Eating, Sleeping Sickness, Dust Mite, Bed Bug, and Bookworm (and in our Professional line: H.I.V. and Hepatitis).

Each 5-to-7 inch doll is accompanied by an image of the real microbe it represents, as well as information about the microbe.

Typhoid is kind of cute. He just might be My Favorite Microbe. I think it’s that funky twirly hat he’s wearing.

I’m scaring myself.

• • •
 
May 30

It’s Never Enough Is It?

Published in Feminism, Misc | one comment

Salon has a new article called “The Littlest Shoppers” by Helaine Olen about the way marketers target the under three-year-old demographic. I think Olen’s point is refreshing: The “intensive parenting” trend is not only driving Generation X parents off the deep end, but it’s also not the answer, that just being with our kids is enough. We don’t have to overachieve to be worth something. This is a refreshing message since so often Generation X hears that we’re slackers because we don’t stage political protests and we’re basically lackadaisical about life. Never mind that many of us are children of divorce, have seen our parents pushed out of corporate jobs at 45, the very same jobs that caused us to be latch-key kids. It seems to be a no-brainer why we job hop every few years, or we opt out of corporate America altogether and start our own businesses that can be molded to suit our family life instead of the other way around. Some of these particular events don’t apply to me personally (so don’t freak out, Mom, K?), but are apt generalizations for many in my generation.

Back to Olen. Here’s the money quote at the end of the article that I found refreshing and really singular in the parenting articles I’ve come across:

Life itself is very stimulating — children don’t need a lot of this extra stuff. Just being with your parents and getting to relax and hang out, or even just sort of sitting in the bouncy seat and watching your mom type on the keyboard as she does her work, or going to the market, or just taking a nap and cuddling, is all the stimulation a baby needs.

This is a great message. Our kids just need us, and it’s OK if mom works.

So get off our freaking backs if we do let our kids watch a Baby Einstein video for 10 minutes while we shower. Olen says:

But everyone needs a break, and instead of just letting kids freak out or complain or whine or cry, Generation X thinks it is OK for them to spend that time in front of the television. Even the naysayers say, “I know that it’s not making him into a genius, but at least I can take a shower.” And this is really the first generation of parents for whom taking a shower has become a high-stakes proposition.

There was a period of time when I could put my daughter in her bouncy seat while I showered, when the play of light above her or her toes were the most fascinating thing in the universe. But that doesn’t last forever, and while we’ve tried to teach our daughter that she can entertain herself, that her imagination can take her places the TV can’t — sometimes I needed 10 minutes of peace to take a shower. It was for ME, for my sanity. Olen is falling prey to her own point when she, however gently, chides parents for not letting their kids cry while they shower.

It’s the same old conflicting message I’ve been hearing for the past four years since my daughter was born and I started to pay attention to parenting advice: Be there totally for your kids at every moment, but somehow find time for yourself; make every moment a learning opportunity so that your child can become the genius she was meant to be, and if she doesn’t then it’s your fault; but for goodness sake, relax about it; make it look effortless.

It’s never enough, is it?

• • •
 
May 25

Danger Gal: Lara Croft/The Gaze: Terry Sheridan

This week’s Danger Gal and Female Gaze installments are related: Tomb Raider 2’s Lara Croft and her love interest/partner/sidekick Terry Sheridan.

Lara CroftGerard Butler’s character of Sheridan is, much to many a female’s delight, objectified but not emasculated. In fact, the Female Gaze celebrates ultra-masculinity while at the same time valuing the character’s emotions.

Sheridan first appears in the movie when Croft rescues him from prison. In this first meeting he’s working out by doing pull-ups from the ceiling and is dressed in less clothing than Lara.

Throughout the movie, Sheridan attempts several times to reconnect with Croft, and his appeals play more to her emotions than to remembered sexual chemistry. The former is more often employed by female characters, the latter by “macho” males. For example, take the following exchange:

Sheridan: So, where do I fit in?

Croft: What do you mean? You’re the guide.

Sheridan: I mean, when you think back on the vast scheme of your hugely adventurous life… where do I fit in? Was I the love of your life, or just another bump on the road? Was I time well spent? Four months? More good than bad? Come on, it had to be more than that, am I right?

Croft: You’re right. It was five months.

At one point in the movie, Croft watches Sheridan undress from afar in a scene that obviously is meant to appeal to a female audience and depicts a woman who clearly has a libido, has in the past acted on that libido and has not been penalized for such actions. (more…)

• • •
 
May 21

My Top Five Favorite Fantasy Novelists

Published in Books | 0 comments

This post finishes up the trifecta of entries on my favorite novelists. If you haven’t read about my favorite Romance and Science Fiction novelists, please follow the links. And read the books! They’re all fantastic.

1. Kelley Armstrong. The friend who recommended Armstrong to me called the Otherworld series “paranormal superfriends” and the label has stuck in my head ever since. I very much enjoyed this series, most especially the prominent role many female characters play in the plot such as Elena, the main character of the first novel, and Paige, Savannah and Eve.

2. Patricia Keneally-Morrison. This author seems to be better known for being married to Jim Morrison than for her Keltria series, but I found her books to be captivating. In the Keltria universe the Celts left Earth and populated several planets in another star system, a planet devoted to each of the main Celtic cultures: Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Brittany. If nothing else, this is an interesting “what if” scenario on how these cultures might have advanced in isolation and it’s written by someone who really knows her Celtic stuff. While the series does involve space travel, I think of Keneally-Morrison’s books as Fantasy because of the rich world-building.

3. Ann Marston. Marston’s Rune Blade and Sword in Exile trilogies are another set of “what ifs” based on Celtic mythology and archeology, specifically the topography of the books are based on the European continent and islands of the UK. I very much enjoyed these books as a pleasant escape into lush world-building.

4. Diana Paxson. When I discovered Paxon’s character Cridilla in The Serpent’s Tooth, her version of the King Llyr myth, it was the first time I consciously recognized how kick-ass heroines fundamentally differ from what I had read previously. Cridilla’s sense of self-determination mattered more to me than success at reaching the goal. I also enjoyed Paxson’s Hallowed Isle series.

5. Marion Zimmer Bradley. If you haven’t noticed it yet, after High Fantasy like a Tolkein, I prefer Celtic Fantasy, specifically that of King Arthur. Zimmer Bradley’s Avalon books rank right up there for me.

Other Notables: Liz Williams, Mary Stewart, Terry Pratchett

• • •
 
May 20

Status Report

Published in Misc | 0 comments

The posts from Danger Gal HQ have been light of late because I’ve been on vacation and my guest bloggers were unable to publish posts. It’s all good. This week I’ll get things back on track and back to our regularly scheduled programming.

Thanks for your support.

• • •
 
May 17

Nerd Fun: Pulp Muppets

Published in Nerd Fun | one comment

• • •
 
May 10

Nerd Fun: The Real Simpsons

Published in Nerd Fun | one comment

• • •
 
May 9

Blagofaire

Published in Nerd Fun | 0 comments

If you haven’t seen “XKCD, A webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language,” then go there right now! It’s hilarious.

Blagofaire

• • •
 
May 8

Which File Extension Are You?

Published in Misc | 0 comments

As a web designer by day I suppose this suits me, but for some reason I’m irked.




Which File Extension are You?

• • •
 
Next Page »